Because FINRA Rule 2111 and the related Dodd-Frank provisions require a significant process reformation and data collaboration, the model should be rules-driven and flexible to optimize the inherent cross business-line data while contemporaneously leveraging any applicable safe harbor provision.
Safe harbors, which constitute a legal provision to reduce or eliminate liability, are often used as a part of a compliance strategy. For example, Rule 2111 requires broker-dealers and associated persons, for both retail and institutional accounts, to document with specificity their reasonable basis for believing that a given profile data element is either not relevant, or alternatively, customer-provided with a reliance on the accuracy of the customer’s submission. The reliance on the submission as part of a rules-based collaborative onboarding process constitutes reasonable basis – provided no red flag or suspicious activity is detected. Because of the ongoing and perpetual suitability requirement, the collaboration feature is likely the next generation of onboarding intelligence.
Rule 2111, in part, is comprised of reasonable-basis suitability. The reasonable-basis obligation requires a broker-dealer or associated person to have a reasonable basis to believe that the product or strategy recommendation is suitable for at least some investors. FINRA, through its guidance, stated that “[b]rokers cannot fulfill their suitability responsibilities … when they fail to understand the securities and investment strategies they recommend.” Where the broker-dealer’s repository already contains product and strategy data, the rules-based query engine could easily harmonize the data (for cross-selling purposes), and/or evaluate profile suitability (for compliance purposes). The collaboration rules are necessary to allow for any after-the-fact determination that may narrow or widen the customer/counterparty risk tolerance, time perspective, or other data element.
Suitability is an often misunderstood concept. Many misapply the suitability test as a subjective determination and attribute the analysis to a single customer – and an anticipated product. This oversimplification effectively wastes useful aggregated customer profile data by failing to leverage system-based profile range analysis.
FINRA Rule 2111 has made customer onboarding more complex. First, the data must be more time-sensitive and dynamic to account for changes in customer risk tolerance, circumstance, or investment strategies. Second, Rule 2111 expands the scope of customer recommendation. The suitability rule applies to any recommendation to a customer. “Customer” is defined broadly as anyone who is not a “broker or dealer” and includes an individual or entity (including institutional customers) with whom a broker-dealer has a business relationship related to brokerage services. Even a non-transactional business relationship where no account was opened, nor any transaction effectuated, under the rules, will constitute a broker-customer relationship.
A rules-based processing engine is necessary to account for changes in customer risk tolerance, circumstance, or investment strategies as required by Rule 2111. Data elements that contribute to customer profiles should be leveraged in advance, while the onboarding solution proactively aligns customers with strategies and simultaneously measures real-time suitability. The collaboration feature must be flexible and rules-based to account for individual circumstances and proprietary business methods.
Comments | Post a Comment
1 Comment to "How Should Broker-Dealers Leverage FINRA Rule 2111?":
Gene Massey
13 September 2012
Under FINRA's Notice 12-25, offering additional clarity of FINRA Rule 2111, offerings under the JOBS Act's new Reg D general solicitation (when allowed) - would there be an unfair advantage to offerings made by individuals or companies, since unlike Broker/Dealers, they would not be subject to the same suitability requirements? See below. It seems to me, brokers would be at an unfair disadvantage if the offering companies are not subject to the same suitability requirements.
Q5. Section 201(a) of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (JOBS Act)29 directs the SEC to amend Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 to eliminate the prohibition on general solicitations to the extent that all purchasers are accredited investors. Does the elimination of the general solicitation prohibition mean that broker-dealers no longer have suitability obligations regarding private placements?
A5. No. The JOBS Act removes certain marketing impediments but not a broker-dealer’s suitability obligations. In that regard, and as explained above in the answer to question 2, a broker-dealer’s general solicitation of a private placement through the use or distribution of marketing or offering materials ordinarily would not, by itself, constitute a recommendation triggering application of the suitability rule.30 When a broker-dealer “recommends” a private placement, however, the suitability rule applies.31
Regulatory Notice 512-25 May 2012
Gene Massey, MediaShares.com